Sectors — Institutional & Government
Risks That Cannot Be Seen Cannot Be Managed
Public facilities run on an assumption — that the supply is stable, that every connection is legitimate, that nothing is wrong until something visibly fails. For a space thousands of people move through daily, assumption is a poor safeguard. Monitoring turns invisible risk into evidence management can act on.
What Runs Unmeasured in Public Infrastructure
Safety risks stay invisible until they fail
Voltage fluctuations outside safe operating ranges leave no trace on a monthly bill. They are only discovered when equipment is already damaged — or when an incident forces the question.
Power-quality faults become a fire hazard
Imbalanced load across a three-phase supply accelerates wear on motors and transformers and causes overheating. In a high-density, high-footfall public space, that is a fire hazard, not just an efficiency loss.
Revenue leaks through connections you can’t see
Diverse, informal connections make it hard to know what is actually drawing from the supply. Illegal connections drain public electricity without authorisation, and without measurement there is no evidence to act on.
What the System Reveals for Public Institutions
We instrument the supply, measure it continuously, analyse the patterns, and advise on what to act on — expressed as safety and governance outcomes, not raw readings.
Power-quality visibility
Voltage levels, phase balance, and harmonic content captured continuously across the supply — so instabilities and imbalances are seen while they can still be corrected, not after they cause damage.
Theft and anomaly detection
Consumption-data analysis flags anomalies consistent with illegal connections drawing from the supply — giving the evidence base needed to investigate and act on revenue leakage.
Safety governance
Findings framed around the people who use the facility. Identifying a fire or equipment-damage risk before an incident is the outcome a public institution is accountable for delivering.
Accountability and reporting
A continuous, evidence-based record of what the supply is doing — the documentation a public body needs to demonstrate its duty of care and justify the actions it takes.
Client Result
Three distinct risks
Voltage instability · Phase imbalance · Power theft — KCCA, USAFI Market
At a public market thousands of people pass through every day, monitoring surfaced three risk areas that were invisible until measured — found and addressed before any became an incident. For a public institution, that visibility is a duty of care.
“The monitoring revealed risks we were not aware of. For a public market with thousands of visitors every day, identifying those risks before an incident was exactly the outcome we needed.”Read full case study →
How We’d Approach Your Facility
The same method we ran for KCCA at USAFI Market, adapted to your infrastructure.
01
Site assessment
We survey the electrical infrastructure — main incomers, distribution boards, and the informal connections public facilities accumulate — to plan where measurement matters most.
02
Metering at key points
Smart energy meters installed at the main incomers and key distribution points, so both consumption and power quality are captured across the sections that carry load.
03
Consumption and power quality
We capture voltage levels, phase balance, harmonic content, and demand profiles over time — the parameters that expose instability, imbalance, and anomalies.
04
Continuous monitoring
Data is transmitted to the Orijtech Energy cloud platform for continuous monitoring and analysis — so risks are surfaced as they emerge and reported to those accountable for acting on them.
See the Risks Before They Become Incidents
A site assessment establishes what your supply is doing and where the safety and governance risks sit — before anything visibly fails.
Request a Site Assessment